Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Vaccine Immunogenicity among Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy Recipients.

Patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy may have impaired humoral responses to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccinations owing to their underlying hematologic malignancy, prior lines of therapy, and CAR-T-associated hypogammaglobulinemia. Comprehensive data on vaccine immunogenicity in this patient population are limited. A single-center retrospective study of adults receiving CD19 or BCMA-directed CAR-T therapy for B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma or multiple myeloma was conducted. Patients received at least 2 doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 or 1 dose of Ad26.COV2.S and had SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike antibody (anti-S IgG) levels measured at least 1 month after the last vaccine dose. Patients were excluded if they received SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody therapy or immunoglobulin within 3 months of the index anti-S titer. The seropositivity rate (assessed by an anti-S assay cutoff of ≥.8 U/mL in the Roche assay) and median anti-S IgG titers were analyzed. Fifty patients were included in the study. The median age was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 58 to 70 years), and the majority were male (68%). Thirty-two participants (64%) had a positive antibody response, with a median titer of 138.5 U/mL (IQR, 11.61 to 2541 U/mL). Receipt of ≥3 vaccines was associated with a significantly higher anti-S IgG level. Our study supports current guidelines for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among recipients of CAR-T therapy and demonstrates that a 3-dose primary series followed by a fourth booster increases antibody levels. However, the relatively low magnitude of titers and low percentage of nonresponders demonstrates that further studies are needed to optimize vaccination timing and determine predictors of vaccine response in this population.

Case report: Clinical course and treatment of SARS-CoV-2 in a pediatric CAR-T cell recipient with persistent hypogammaglobulinemia.

This report describes a pediatric patient who underwent chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) four years prior, with resultant hypogammaglobulinemia for which he was receiving weekly subcutaneous immune globulin. He presented with persistent fever, dry cough, and a tingling sensation in his toes following a confirmed COVID-19 infection 3 weeks prior. His initial nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 PCR was negative, leading to an extensive workup for other infections. He was ultimately diagnosed with persistent lower respiratory tract COVID-19 infection based on positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) sampling. He was treated with a combination of remdesivir (antiviral) and casirivimab/imdevimab (combination monoclonal antibodies) with immediate improvement in fever, respiratory symptoms, and neurologic symptoms.

Identification of genomic determinants contributing to cytokine release in immunotherapies and human diseases.

BACKGROUND: Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is a strong immune system response that can occur as a result of the reaction of a cellular immunotherapy with malignant cells. While the frequency and management of CRS in CAR T-cell therapy has been well documented, there is emerging interest in pre-emptive treatment to reduce CRS severity and improve overall outcomes. Accordingly, identification of genomic determinants that contribute to cytokine release may lead to the development of targeted therapies to prevent or abrogate the severity of CRS. METHODS: Forty three clinical CD22 CAR T-cell products were collected for RNA extraction. 100 ng of mRNA was used for Nanostring assay analysis which is based on the nCounter platform. Several public datasets were used for validation purposes. RESULTS: We found the expression of the PFKFB4 gene and glycolytic pathway activity were upregulated in CD22 CAR T-cells given to patients who developed CRS compared to those who did not experience CRS. Moreover, these results were further validated in cohorts with COVID-19, influenza infections and autoimmune diseases, and in tumor tissues. The findings were similar, except that glycolytic pathway activity was not increased in patients with influenza infections and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). CONCLUSION: Our data strongly suggests that PFKFB4 acts as a driving factor in mediating cytokine release in vivo by regulating glycolytic activity. Our results suggest that it would beneficial to develop drugs targeting PFKFB4 and the glycolytic pathway for the treatment of CRS.

Humoral Responses to Repetitive Doses of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines in Patients with CAR-T-Cell Therapy.

Background: Due to B-cell aplasia following CAR-T-cell therapy, patients are at risk of severe SARS-CoV-2 course. Methods: COVID-19 vaccines were assessed by IgG antibody tests against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (anti-S1/S2). Vaccination procedures: group (1): CAR-T-cells followed by two to four vaccine doses; group (2): Two vaccine doses prior to CAR-T-cells, followed by doses 3 or 4. Results: In group 1 (n = 32), 7/30 patients (23.2%) had positive antibody tests after a second dose, 9/23 (39.1%) after a third dose, and 3/3 patients after a fourth dose. A third dose led to seroconversion in 5 of 21 patients (23.8%) with available data, while a fourth dose did so in 2/3 patients. Higher B-cells (AUC: 96.2%, CI: 89-100, p = 0.0006) and lower CAR-T-cell copies (AUC: 77.3%, CI: 57-97, p = 0.0438) were predictive of positive humoral vaccine response. In group 2 (n = 14), 6/14 patients (42.9%) had a positive antibody test after a second dose, 3/8 patients (37.5%) after a third dose, and 3/4 patients after a fourth dose. A third dose led to seroconversion in 1/8 patients (12.5%), while a fourth dose did so in 3/4 patients. Conclusion: Additional vaccine doses increased seroconversion rates whilst high B-cell counts and low CAR-T-cell copy numbers were associated with positive antibody response.

The burden of SARS-CoV-2 in patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T cell immunotherapy: everything to lose.

INTRODUCTION: Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell immunotherapy has revolutionized the prognosis of refractory or relapsed B-cell malignancies. CAR-T cell recipients have immunosuppression generated by B-cell aplasia, leading to a higher susceptibility to respiratory virus infections and poor response to vaccination. AREAS COVERED: This review focuses on the challenge posed by B-cell targeted immunotherapies: managing long-lasting B-cell impairment during the successive surges of a deadly viral pandemic. We restricted this report to data regarding vaccine efficacy in CAR-T cell recipients, outcomes after developing COVID-19 and specificities of treatment management. We searched in MEDLINE database to identify relevant studies until 31 March 2022. EXPERT OPINION: Among available observational studies, the pooled mortality rate reached 40% in CAR-T cell recipients infected by SARS-CoV-2. Additionally, vaccine responses seem to be widely impaired in recipients (seroconversion 20%, T-cell response 50%). In this setting of B-cell depletion, passive immunotherapy is the backbone of treatment. Convalescent plasma therapy has proven to be a highly effective curative treatment with rare adverse events. Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies could be used as pre-exposure prophylaxis or early treatment but their neutralizing activity is constantly challenged by new variants. In order to reduce viral replication, direct-acting antiviral drugs should be considered.

Immune Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Young Patients with Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell-Induced B Cell Aplasia.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines are capable of inducing combined humoral and cellular immunity. Which effect is more relevant for their potent protective effects is unclear, but isolated T cell responses without seroconversion in healthy household members of individuals with Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) suggest that T cell responses effectively protect against clinical infection. Oncologic patients have an outsize risk of unfavorable outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 infection and therefore were prioritized when vaccines first became available, although the quality of their immune response to vaccination was expected to be suboptimal, as has been confirmed in subsequent studies. Inherently, patients with anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy-mediated B cell aplasia would be incapable of generating humoral responses, so that assessment of the vaccine-induced cellular immunity is all the more important to gauge whether the vaccine can induce meaningful protection. A salient difference between T cell and humoral responses is the former's relative impassiveness to mutations of the antigen, which is more relevant than ever since the advent of the omicron variant. The objective of this study was to assess the immune cell composition and spike protein-specific T cell responses before and after the first and second doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in a cohort of juvenile CD19 CAR T cell therapy recipients with enduring B cell aplasia. The prospective study included all patients age >12 years diagnosed with multiply relapsed B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia and treated with anti-CD19 CAR T cell (CAR-T19) therapy in our center. The primary endpoint was the detection of cell-mediated and humoral responses to vaccine (flow cytometry and anti-S immunoglobulin G, respectively). Secondary endpoints included the incidence of vaccine-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events, exacerbation of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), relapse, and the influence of the vaccine on CAR T cells and lymphocyte subsets. Even though one-half of the patients exhibited subnormal lymphocyte counts and marginal CD4/CD8 ratios, after 2 vaccinations all showed brisk T-cell responsiveness to spike protein, predominantly in the CD4 compartment, which quantitatively was well within the range of healthy controls. No severe vaccine-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events, GVHD exacerbation, or relapse was observed in our cohort. We posit that SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines induce meaningful cellular immunity in patients with isolated B cell deficiency due to CAR-T19 therapy.

CAR-T Cell Therapy for the Treatment of ALL: Eradication Conditions and In Silico Experimentation

In this paper, we explore the application of Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cell therapy for the treatment of Acute Lymphocytic Leukaemia (ALL) by means of in silico experimentation, mathematical modelling through first-order Ordinary Differential Equations and nonlinear systems theory. By combining the latter with systems biology on cancer evolution we were able to establish a sufficient condition on the therapy dose to ensure complete response. The latter is illustrated across multiple numerical simulations when comparing three mathematically formulated administration protocols with one of a phase 1 dose-escalation trial on CAR-T cells for the treatment of ALL on children and young adults. Therefore, both our analytical and in silico results are consistent with real-life scenarios. Finally, our research indicates that tumour cells growth rate and the killing efficacy of the therapy are key factors in the designing of personalised strategies for cancer treatment.

Nanotechnology-enabled immunoengineering approaches to advance therapeutic applications.

Immunotherapy has reached clinical success in the last decade, with the emergence of new and effective treatments such as checkpoint blockade therapy and CAR T-cell therapy that have drastically improved patient outcomes. Still, these therapies can be improved to limit off-target effects, mitigate systemic toxicities, and increase overall efficacies. Nanoscale engineering offers strategies that enable researchers to attain these goals through the manipulation of immune cell functions, such as enhancing immunity against cancers and pathogens, controlling the site of immune response, and promoting tolerance via the delivery of small molecule drugs or biologics. By tuning the properties of the nanomaterials, such as size, shape, charge, and surface chemistry, different types of immune cells can be targeted and engineered, such as dendritic cells for immunization, or T cells for promoting adaptive immunity. Researchers have come to better understand the critical role the immune system plays in the progression of pathologies besides cancer, and developing nanoengineering approaches that seek to harness the potential of immune cell activities can lead to favorable outcomes for the treatment of injuries and diseases.

New and emerging pharmacotherapies for the management of multiple myeloma.

PURPOSE: The pharmacology, efficacy, safety, and dosing/administration of new and emerging therapies for the treatment of multiple myeloma are summarized. SUMMARY: There have been significant advancements in the treatment of multiple myeloma in recent years, with an expansion of available drug therapies. Newer therapies for multiple myeloma include the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies daratumumab and isatuximab, the exportin 1 inhibitor selinexor, the anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) antibody-drug conjugate belantamab mafodotin, and the chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy idecabtagene vicleucel. These agents have unique toxicity profiles, specific monitoring parameters, and operational considerations that clinicians treating multiple myeloma should be aware of. There is likely to be continued rapid expansion of new agents for patients with multiple myeloma, as there are many novel investigational agents in the drug development pipeline, such as bispecific antibodies and additional CAR T-cell therapies. CONCLUSION: Several therapeutic agents have been recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of multiple myeloma. There are many novel agents in the pipeline, including bispecific antibodies and CAR T-cell therapies that have the potential to continue to change the treatment landscape of multiple myeloma.

COVID-19 immunotherapy: Treatment based on the immune cell-mediated approaches.

Multiple efforts are currently underway to control and treat severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) worldwide. Despite all efforts, the virus that emerged in Wuhan city has rapidly spread globally and led to a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) due to the lack of approved antiviral therapy. Nevertheless, SARS-CoV-2 has had a significant influence on the evolution of cellular therapeutic approaches. Adoptive immune cell therapy is innovative and offers either promising prophylactic or therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19. This approach is aimed at developing safety and providing secure and effective therapy in combination with standard therapy for all COVID-19 infected individuals. Based on the effective results of previous studies on both inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, various immune cell therapies against COVID-19 have been reviewed and discussed. It must be considered that the application of cell therapy for treatment and to eliminate infected respiratory cells could result in excessive inflammation, so this treatment must be used in combination with other treatments, despite its many beneficial efforts.

[Prevention and management of infections in patients undergoing CAR T-cell therapy: Recommendations of the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC)]. / Prise en charge prophylactique, thérapeutique des complications infectieuses et vaccination des patients traités par CAR-T cells : recommandations de la Société francophone de greffe de moelle et de thérapie cellulaire (SFGM-TC).

Infections occurring after CAR T-cells are a common complication. At the acute phase of treatment following CAR T-cell infusion, the exact incidence of infections is unknown given the overlapping symptoms with cytokine release syndrome. The risk factors for infection include the malignant underlying disease and its multiple treatments, and an immunosuppressive state induced by CAR-T cells themselves and the treatment of their complications. During the twelfth edition of practice harmonization workshops of the Francophone society of bone marrow transplantation and cellular therapy (SFGM-TC), a working group focused its work on the management of post-CAR infectious complications. In this review we discuss anti-infection prophylaxis and vaccination of patients undergoing CAR T-cell therapy as well as a special chapter for the specific case of COVID-19. These recommendations apply to commercial CAR-T cells, in order to guide strategies for the management and prevention of infectious complications associated with this new therapeutic approach.

Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy for Tumor Prevention and Treatment.

In this editorial, we highlight articles published in this Special Issue of Vaccines on "Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy for Tumor Prevention and Treatment", recent developments in the field of cancer vaccines, and the potential for immunotherapeutic combinations in cancer care. This issue covers important developments and progress being made in the cancer vaccine field and possible future directions for exploring new technologies to produce optimal immune responses against cancer and expand the arena of prophylactic and therapeutic cancer vaccines for the treatment of this deadly disease.

Potential of Immunotherapies in Treating Hematological Cancer-Infection Comorbidities-A Mathematical Modelling Approach.

BACKGROUND: The immune system attacks threats like an emerging cancer or infections like COVID-19 but it also plays a role in dealing with autoimmune disease, e.g., inflammatory bowel diseases, and aging. Malignant cells may tend to be eradicated, to appraoch a dormant state or escape the immune system resulting in uncontrolled growth leading to cancer progression. If the immune system is busy fighting a cancer, a severe infection on top of it may compromise the immunoediting and the comorbidity may be too taxing for the immune system to control. METHOD: A novel mechanism based computational model coupling a cancer-infection development to the adaptive immune system is presented and analyzed. The model maps the outcome to the underlying physiological mechanisms and agree with numerous evidence based medical observations. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Progression of a cancer and the effect of treatments depend on the cancer size, the level of infection, and on the efficiency of the adaptive immune system. The model exhibits bi-stability, i.e., virtual patient trajectories gravitate towards one of two stable steady states: a dormant state or a full-blown cancer-infection disease state. An infectious threshold curve exists and if infection exceed this separatrix for sufficiently long time the cancer escapes. Thus, early treatment is vital for remission and severe infections may instigate cancer progression. CAR T-cell Immunotherapy may sufficiently control cancer progression back into a dormant state but the therapy significantly gains efficiency in combination with antibiotics or immunomodulation.

Cytokine Release Syndrome Associated with T-Cell-Based Therapies for Hematological Malignancies: Pathophysiology, Clinical Presentation, and Treatment.

Cytokines are a broad group of small regulatory proteins with many biological functions involved in regulating the hematopoietic and immune systems. However, in pathological conditions, hyperactivation of the cytokine network constitutes the fundamental event in cytokine release syndrome (CRS). During the last few decades, the development of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and T-cell therapies has rapidly evolved, and CRS can be a serious adverse event related to these treatments. CRS is a set of toxic adverse events that can be observed during infection or following the administration of antibodies for therapeutic purposes and, more recently, during T-cell-engaging therapies. CRS is triggered by on-target effects induced by binding of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells or bispecific antibody to its antigen and by subsequent activation of bystander immune and non-immune cells. CRS is associated with high circulating concentrations of several pro-inflammatory cytokines, including interleukins, interferons, tumor necrosis factors, colony-stimulating factors, and transforming growth factors. Recently, considerable developments have been achieved with regard to preventing and controlling CRS, but it remains an unmet clinical need. This review comprehensively summarizes the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and treatment of CRS caused by T-cell-engaging therapies utilized in the treatment of hematological malignancies.

The Next-Generation of Combination Cancer Immunotherapy: Epigenetic Immunomodulators Transmogrify Immune Training to Enhance Immunotherapy.

Cancer immunotherapy harnesses the immune system by targeting tumor cells that express antigens recognized by immune system cells, thus leading to tumor rejection. These tumor-associated antigens include tumor-specific shared antigens, differentiation antigens, protein products of mutated genes and rearrangements unique to tumor cells, overexpressed tissue-specific antigens, and exogenous viral proteins. However, the development of effective therapeutic approaches has proven difficult, mainly because these tumor antigens are shielded, and cells primarily express self-derived antigens. Despite innovative and notable advances in immunotherapy, challenges associated with variable patient response rates and efficacy on select tumors minimize the overall effectiveness of immunotherapy. Variations observed in response rates to immunotherapy are due to multiple factors, including adaptative resistance, competency, and a diversity of individual immune systems, including cancer stem cells in the tumor microenvironment, composition of the gut microbiota, and broad limitations of current immunotherapeutic approaches. New approaches are positioned to improve the immune response and increase the efficacy of immunotherapies, highlighting the challenges that the current global COVID-19 pandemic places on the present state of immunotherapy.

Cardiotoxicity of Contemporary Anticancer Immunotherapy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Contemporary anticancer immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, has changed the landscape of treatment for patients with a variety of malignancies who historically had a poor prognosis. However, both immune checkpoint inhibitors and CAR T cell therapy are associated with serious cardiovascular adverse effects. As immunotherapy evolves to include high-risk patients with preexisting cardiovascular risk factors and disease, the risk and relevance of its associated cardiotoxicity will be even higher. RECENT FINDINGS: ICI can cause myocarditis, which usually occurs early after initiation, can be fulminant, and prompt treatment with high-dose corticosteroids is crucial. CAR T cell therapy frequently leads to cytokine release syndrome, which is associated with cardiomyopathy or arrhythmia development and may also result in circulatory collapse. Supportive treatment, as well as tocilizumab, an anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody, is the cornerstone of treatment. Recent findings suggest that preexisting cardiovascular risk factors and disease may increase the risk of such cardiotoxicity, and prompt recognition, as well as treatment, may favorably alter the outcomes. SUMMARY: ICI and CAR T cell therapy have improved cancer-related outcomes; however, they both are associated with potentially therapy-limiting cardiotoxicity. Cardio-oncologists are required to play an important role in patient selection, pretherapy cardiovascular optimization, and prompt recognition and treatment of cardiotoxicity.